Posts tagged as:

DirectRevenue

CDT:US failing to prosecute Cyber criminals

by certifiedbug on August 14, 2008

in Security

State AGs Fail to Adequately Protect Online Consumers
New report from the Center for American Progress and Center for Democracy and Technology finds that state attorneys general receive thousands of complaints of online fraud and abuse but have launched relatively few cases in responseWashington, D.C. — State attorneys general received thousands of consumer complaints of online fraud and abuse in 2006 and 2007 and yet, with the exception of several notable standouts, brought few significant cases in response, according to a report released today from the Center for American Progress and the Center for Democracy and Technology, Online Consumers at Risk and the Role of State Attorneys General.

Most states supplied the authors with a top 10 list ranking consumer complaint categories (Internet-related and other). In 2007, 24 out of 30 states that provided rankings reported an Internet-related category within their top 10. Eight states ranked Internet-related complaints among their top three most common consumer complaints, including four states that ranked Internet-related complaints at the top of the list.

For 2007 and 2006, 20 states provided the number of consumer complaints associated with each category—the others merely provided rankings without giving the number of complaints. In both years, these states reported roughly 20,000 Internet-related complaints.

The Federal Trade Commission also provides data for all 50 states on consumer complaints related to Internet fraud. These data are compiled from a variety of sources, including 13 state attorneys general. In 2007, the FTC reported 221,226 Internet-related fraud complaints, up almost 16,000 from 2006 and more than 24,000 in 2005.

“These numbers are startling, but they may even understate the problem,” said Reece Rushing, director of regulatory and information policy at the Center for American Progress. “Consumers are often unaware, and thus may not report, when they are victimized by online threats such as spyware or phishing. We must take action against these threats to protect consumers and preserve confidence in Internet commerce.”

As described in the report, several attorneys general, in particular those in New York and Washington state, brought important cases on behalf of online consumers. New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, for example, recently announced groundbreaking settlements with Priceline, Travelocity, and Cingular, which advertised using Direct Revenue, a company that surreptitiously installed adware on consumers’ computers. In Washington, meanwhile, Attorney General Rob McKenna reached a recent settlement with the operators of several websites that lured more than 13,000 Washington consumers to divulge personal information that was then sold to third parties.

Despite these successes, however, most attorneys general have not given high priority to online fraud and abuse.

Center for Democracy and Technology:  Press release

{ 0 comments }

DirectRevenue-Best Offers, shut down

by certifiedbug on October 24, 2007

in Security

Posted on its home page and giving no reason for the sudden closure.

Best Offers and Direct Revenue have ceased operations. To service legacy consumers we are maintaining this page of uninstall instructions, an uninstall software tool, and an email based support service.

By most accounts DirectRevenue made a lot of money off unsuspecting users.

{ 0 comments }

DirectRevenue’s deep pockets

by certifiedbug on February 21, 2007

in Security

Commissioner Jon Leibowitz was the sole dissenter in the FTC’s 4-1 decision against DirectRevenue and issued a separate statement.

“In this consent agreement, Commission staff obtained strong injunctive relief that will put an end to practices that allowed DirectRevenue to foist unwanted software on untold millions of consumers. But the $1.5 million in monetary relief that the Commission obtained as part of the consent agreement is a disappointment because it apparently leaves DirectRevenue’s owners lining their pockets with more than $20 million from a business model based on deceit.”

“I would rather go to trial and risk losing than settle for a compromise that makes an FTC action just a cost of doing business.”

Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Jon Leibowitz. (PDF)

The settlement statement (PDF) notes that it “does not constitute an admission that the law has been violated as alleged.”

No news there, DirectRevenue has a long history of denial and blaming affiliates.

Direct Revenue’s Dirty Documents by Ben Edelman

{ 1 comment }

DirectRevenue Settles FTC Charges

by certifiedbug on February 18, 2007

in News, Security

Federal Trade Commission
February 16, 2007

Will Give Up $1.5 Million in Ill-Gotten Gains for Unfair and Deceptive Adware Downloads

DirectRevenue LLC, a large adware distributor, and four of its principals have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they used unfair and deceptive methods to download adware onto consumers’ computers and then obstruct them from removing it, in violation of federal law. The settlement bars future downloads of DirectRevenue’s adware without consumers’ express consent and requires DirectRevenue to provide a reasonable and effective way for consumers to locate and remove the adware from their computers. The settlement also require DirectRevenue to give up $1.5 million in ill-gotten gains.

DirectRevenue’s adware infected computers worldwide,” said FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras. “The FTC settlement brings unauthorized software downloads to a halt and stops DirectRevenue from sending pop-up ads to computers affected by prior unlawful downloads.

Full Article

Landmark anti-spyware settlement

by certifiedbug on January 30, 2007

in News, Security

Press release from the New York State Attorney General’s Office.

NEW YORK, NY (January 29, 2007)—Attorney General Andrew Cuomo today announced that New York has reached ground-breaking settlements with three major online advertisers for promoting products and services on the Internet through deceptively installed programs known as “adware.” The agreements, with Priceline.com Incorporated (“Priceline”), Travelocity.com LP (“Travelocity”) and Cingular Wireless LLC (“Cingular”) mark the first time law enforcement has held advertisers responsible for ads displayed through adware.

The settlements grew out of the Internet Bureau’s investigation of DirectRevenue. People of the State of New York v. Direct Revenue, LLC.

Priceline, Travelocity and Cingular, among others, were discovered to have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars delivering ads through Direct Revenue software. Not a surprise, many legitimate companies fund the proliferation of adware with their advertising dollars, despite anti-spyware activists.

Ben Edelman “Spyware”: Research, Testing, Legislation, and Suits

Bad Practices Continue at Zango. Additional Comments

by certifiedbug on December 9, 2006

in Security

Ben Edelman and Eric Howes:

Update December 8: Our follow-up comment to the FTC discusses additional concerns, further ongoing bad practices at Zango, and the special difficulty of enforcement in light of practices seemingly not prohibited by the proposed settlement.

Additional Comments on Improper Zango Practices. (PDF)

Article

Bad Practices Continue at Zango

by certifiedbug on November 20, 2006

in Security

By Ben Edelman and Eric Howes
November 20, 2006

Earlier this month, the FTC announced the proposed settlement of its investigation into Zango, makers of advertising software widely installed onto users’ computers without their consent or without their informed consent (among other bad practices).

We commend the proposed settlement’s core terms. But despite these strong provisions, bad practices continue at Zango — practices that, in our judgment, put Zango in violation of the key terms and requirements of the FTC settlement.

Full article

{ 0 comments }

SmartBrowser and Zango

by certifiedbug on July 22, 2006

in Security

spywareguide.com
July 21, 2006
Paperghost posts:

What we have here is a clear example of Bait and Switch - luring you in with one offer, only to be denied the desired item, but presented with a “substitute” at the last moment. The difference here, is that the webmaster also gets to install Smart Browser onto the PC in the process - I suppose you could call it a two for the price of one deal or a “bonus”. Even if the end-user doesn’t choose to download any Zango videos, they’ll still be receiving pop-ups (and possibly premium rate dialers) via Smart Browser.

Article and screenshots

Business Week’s Direct Revenue Cover Story

by certifiedbug on July 7, 2006

in Security

Business Week Online takes a look at spammers and pop-up advertisers, using Direct Revenue as an example.

Among Direct Revenue’s alumni, pride over technical cunning mingles with regret for exasperating so many computer users. After waffling on the issue during a long interview, one former Dark Arts wizard sighs and sums up his version of the company credo with an elegiac observation by abolitionist Frederick Douglass: “Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them.

The Plot To Hijack Your Computer

Yapbrowser acquired by Searchwebme

by certifiedbug on July 6, 2006

in Browser, Security

Blog.spywareguide
Posted by Paperghost on July 6, 2006

Yep, it’s Yap time again. The Yap (of course) being Yapbrowser - a free web-browser that served up a whole lot more than end-users were probably bargaining for. Just when you think there’s nothing more to write about, something else pops up and gets the whole story moving again. In this case, a tip from RinCe illustrates that there are some people who will still take a gamble on one of the strangest browser stories in years. Step up to the plate, Searchwebme (you’ll need to scroll down to the entry dated Tuesday, 12th June):